top of page
Wood Panel

ESG: A Balancing Act of Profit and Purpose

Updated: Jan 29

Green leaves financed by investment capital

Balancing Sustainability and Financial Performance

The ongoing backlash against ESG in the United States is creating ripples in sustainable investing. The crux of the issue lies in the industry's struggle to clearly link ESG factors with long-term financial returns. This challenge is highlighted by BlackRock's recent shift in focus. Initially heralding sustainability as central to their investment approach, they have now adjusted their language, emphasizing the search for companies with "financial resilience" capable of managing risks for sustained financial returns.

BlackRock's Pivot and Industry Implications

BlackRock, once a vocal advocate for purpose-driven investing, is recalibrating its stance amidst growing political and public scrutiny. The $9 tn giant, initially committed to a sustainability-centric investment approach, is subtly shifting gears. Earlier this week, BlackRock pivoted its language saying it will stress “financial resilience” in its engagement priorities with companies, asking how companies are managing risks to ensure they deliver long-term financial returns.

This shift was prompted by the increased politicization of ESG in the US. Several US state treasurers are blacklisting financial groups deemed too progressive on environmental issues. Some states are even passing laws to limit ESG considerations, creating a significant transatlantic divide with European counterparts who generally favor aggressive net zero commitments.

Performance Issues Drive the Need to Quantify Financial Impact

The ESG debate isn't just about political leanings; it's rooted in performance. ESG funds, often tech-heavy and low exposure in fossil fuels, performed poorly amid high interest rates and favorable energy markets. This has led to outflows from ESG funds in the US.

The industry is now tasked with a complex challenge: proving a quantifiable link between sustainability measures and financial returns. This isn't straightforward, as simple correlations fail to capture the nuanced interplay between ESG factors and financial performance. Advanced quantitative models are required, pushing the industry towards a more rigorous, data-driven approach.

Embracing Technology and Machine Learning for Sustainable Success

BlackRock's pivot, along with the broader industry's performance struggles, suggests a future where ESG investing is more nuanced and integrated with financial analysis. A more holistic approach that balances purpose with profit is very much needed.

The future first hinges on technology. While the global adoption of IFRS Sustainability Standards will set a much-needed uniform reporting baseline, the digital reporting and consumption of such information will significantly advance sustainable investing. Technology will streamline the collection, analysis and comparability of sustainability data.

Moreover, the industry must embrace advanced machine learning techniques to dissect the complex interplay between various ESG elements and financial resilience. A nuanced understanding of how different factors combine – such as the interplay between DEI initiatives and the strategic removal of low performers – can reveal pathways to social good and robust long-term financial returns. 

The recent pivot by BlackRock points to a maturation in sustainable investing, where profit and purpose must be balanced. Achieving such a balance is not easy. It requires quantitatively analyzing the relationships between ESG factor analysis with financial insights, supported by the digital reporting and consumption of consistent sustainability disclosures.  These are necessities for sustainable investing to flourish in an increasingly scrutinized and politicized landscape, where doing good must also mean performing well financially.

About PortageBay

PortageBay provides sustainability analytics that combine sustainability expertise with data science-driven. Offerings include sustainability-to-financial models, transition suitability, quantitative scores and climate modeling. 

Clients include global asset managers, pension funds, capital markets, and strategic advisors, analyzing $2+ trillion in client assets. If you’d like to learn more, please visit

59 views0 comments


bottom of page